OPTi, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00021 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2009)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Before the court are the defendant Apple, Inc.’s (“Apple”) motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) or for a new trial regarding willfulness (Dkt. No. 182); motion for JMOL and new trial regarding the 35 U.S.C. § 112 enablement defense (Dkt. No. 175); motion for a new trial, remittitur, and JMOL regarding damages (Dkt. No. 183); motion for JMOL regarding prior art invalidity or for a new trial (Dkt. No.