Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mershon v. Sling Media, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00006 (E.D. Tex. July 5, 2007)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00006, Dkt. No. 26
Decided
July 5, 2007
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - re 10 Motion to Transfer Venue. Dfts Motion to Transfer Venue is Denied for reasons set forth herein
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Sling Media, Inc.’s (“Sling Media”) Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant (#10). The defendant requests that this case be tra nsferred to the N orthern District of California pursua nt to 28 U.S.C . § 1404(a) . After car efully considering the par ties’ written submissions, the defendant’s motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in this opinion. I. Background Plaintiff Stuart Mershon (“Mershon”) alleges that Sling Media infringes United States Patent No. 6,212,282 (“the ‘282 patent”).