Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Black v. Ce Soir Lingerie Co., Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00544 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2008)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00544, Dkt. No. 194
Decided
August 15, 2008
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - for the reasons discussed herein, Dft's Motion for Summary Judgment for Non-Infringement and Invalidity 135 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART AS MOOT
Length
30 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment For Non-Infringement and Invalidity (Doc. No. 135). F or the re asons discussed he rein, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment F or No n-Infringement ( Doc. N o. 135) and Invalidity is GRANTED IN P ART and DENIED IN PART AS MOOT. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Randi Black initiated the present lawsuit in an attempt to enforce her intellectual property rights in United St ates Patent No. 7,152,606 ( hereinafter “the ‘ 606 patent”), which she claims Defendants are actively infringing.