Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Negotiated Data Solutions, LLC v. Dell, Inc.,, No. 2:06-cv-00528 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 16, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00528, Dkt. No. 197
Decided
January 16, 2009
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER construing the disputed claim terms
Length
60 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Negotiated Data Solutions, LLC (“N-Data”) filed its complaint against Dell, Inc. (“Dell”) on December 13, 2006, alleging patent infringement. Dell subsequently impleaded the original owner and developer of the patents-in-suit, National Semiconductor (“National”). N-Data accuses Dell of infringing four patents – U. S. Patent Nos. 5,361,261 (“the ‘261 patent), RE38,820 (“the ‘820 patent”), RE39,216 (“the ‘216 patent”), and RE39,395 (“the ‘395 patent”). Each of the patents was originally developed and owned by National.