Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. Alltel Corporation et al, No. 2:06-cv-00504 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00504, Dkt. No. 284
Decided
September 24, 2008
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying deft's #170 motion to sever and stay
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of the defendants’ Motion (#170) to Sever and Stay, or in the Alternative, to Transfer, has been presented for consideration. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct.