Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fiber Systems International, Inc. v. Applied Optical Systems, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00473 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00473, Dkt. No. 336
Decided
October 26, 2009
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Court grants in part and denies in part the motion for summary judgment as set forth herein
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Pending before the court is the plaintiff Fiber Systems International, Inc.’s (“FSI”) motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 260) on the defendant Applied Optical Systems, Inc.’s (“AOSI”) affirmative defenses and counterclaims. For the reasons discussed below, the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. II. Factual and Procedural Background FSI filed its complaint on November 14, 2006 against AOSI; FSI currently alleges infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,305,849 C1 (“the ‘849 patent”).