Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. et al v. ADT Security Services, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00462 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2008)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction Plaintiffs Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. (“ Paradox”), Shmuel Hershkovitz and Pinhas Shpater (collectively, “plaintiffs”) allege that defendants ADT Security Services, Inc. and Tyco Safety Products Canada, Ltd. (formerly Digi tal Security Controls , Ltd.), Monitronics International, Inc. and Protection One, Inc. (col lectively, “defendants”) infringe claims 1, 2, 5 and 11 of U.S. Patent No.