Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Orica Explosives Technology, Pty. Ltd. v. Austin Powder Company, No. 2:06-cv-00450 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 13, 2007)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00450, Dkt. No. 23
Decided
April 13, 2007
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - order denying deft's motion to dismiss and granting motion to transfer case to the Central District of California
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is D efendant Austin Powder Company’s (“Austin Powder”) Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Transfer (#11). Austin Powder moves to dismiss this case for improper venue pursuant to Fed. R. C iv. P. 1 2(b)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1 406(a). In the alternative, Austin Powder requests that this action be transf erred to the United States District Court for the Centra l District of California, pursuant to either the first-to-file rule or for the convenience of the parties and witnesses pursua nt to 28 U.S.C . § 1404(a) .