Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Aerielle Inc. v. Monster Cable Products, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00382 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2007)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00382, Dkt. No. 23
Decided
March 26, 2007
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - denying deft's motion to Transfer Venue for reasons set forth herein
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Monster Cable Products, Inc.’s (“Monster Cable”) Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant (#10). The defendant requests that this case be transferred to the Northern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions, the defendant’s motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in this opinion. I. Background Plaintiff Aerielle, Inc. (“Aerielle”) sued Monster Cable for infringing United States Patent Nos. 5,771,331 and 6,671,494.