Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Biax Corp v. Sun Microsystems Inc et al, No. 2:06-cv-00364 (E.D. Tex. July 18, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00364, Dkt. No. 155
Decided
July 18, 2008
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the above constructions. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Parties are ordered t…
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction In this case, Biax Corporation (“Biax”) asserts various claims of two pate nts against Sun Microsystems, Incorporated (“Sun”). The asserted patents are U.S. Patent Nos. 5,517,628 (“the ‘628 patent”) and 6,253,313 (“the ‘313 patent”) (collectively “the patents-in-suit”). The patents-in-suit are related and share a common written description. This opinion resolves the parties’ various claim1 construction disputes.