Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cooper Technologies, Inc. v. Thomas & Betts Corporation, No. 2:06-cv-00242 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00242, Dkt. No. 75
Decided
March 31, 2008
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion to stay pentind completion of the reexamination proceedings
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is the defendant’s motion (#20) to stay this action pending reexamination of the patents-in-suit. For the foregoing reasons, the court denies the defendant’s motion. 1. Background In this case, Cooper Technologies, Co. (“Cooper”) contends that Thomas & Betts, Corp. (“Thomas & Betts”) infringes various claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,504,103 and 6,984,791. The ‘791 patent issued from an application that was a continuation of the application that underlies the ‘103 patent.