Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Leap Wireless International, Inc. v. Metro PCS Communications, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00240 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 15, 2007)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00240, Dkt. No. 68
Decided
February 15, 2007
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - denying motion #39 and #40 to dismiss
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Third Party Defendants Thomas Bernard and Harvey White’s Motions to Dismiss (#39 and #40, respectively). After reviewing the parties’ briefs and applicable case law, the Court DENIES the motions for the reasons set forth below. I. Introduction Plaintiffs Leap Wireless International, Inc. (“Leap”) and Cricket Communications, Inc. filed1 this lawsuit against MetroPCS Communications, Inc. (“MetroPCS”) for infringement of U.S. Patent No.