Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Flashmark Technologies,Llc v. Gtech Corporation et al, No. 2:06-cv-00205 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2007)

Granted in Part
Discovery
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00205, Dkt. No. 131
Decided
August 6, 2007
Judge
Keith F. Giblin, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - re: to the Dfts Motion to Compel 121 is granted in part and denied in part
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ON DEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 37 Defendants’ G TECH Cor poration a nd GT ECH Ho ldings Co rporation (c ollectively “GTECH”) Motion to Compel [Doc. #121] is referred to the undersigned for a determination. The motion seeks to compel Plaintiffs Flashmark Technologies, LLC, et. al., (collectively “Flashmark”) to produce previously redacted documents. GTECH argues that relevant evidence was redacted from these documents and/or that no privilege exists to protect these documents from discovery.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case