Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation et al v. Power Integrations, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00151 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2007)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The court grants in part and denies in part Power Integrations, Inc.’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer this case to Delaware (#20). On Oc tober 2 0, 20 04, Po wer I ntegrations, Inc. (“ Power I ntegrations”) s ued F airchild Semiconductor In ternational, In c. a nd F airchild S emiconductor C orporation ( collectively, “Fairchild”) for patent infringe ment in the District Court for the District of Delaw are. I n the Delaware litigation, Power Integrations asserts four patents against Fairchild. One of the patents is U.S. Patent No.