Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

FCI USA Inc et al v. Tyco Electronics Corporation, No. 2:06-cv-00128 (E.D. Tex. July 24, 2006)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00128, Dkt. No. 36
Decided
July 24, 2006
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying Tyco's motion to transfer venue
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiffs FCI USA, Inc. and FCI Americas Technology, Inc. (collectively “FCI”) sued Tyco Electronics Corporation (hereinafter “Tyco”) for allegedly infringing Un ited States Patent Nos. 6,976,886 (the ‘886 patent), 6,988,982 (the ‘982 patent), and 6,944,569 (the ‘982 patent). FCI also asserts claims of unfair competition and trade secret misappropriation. Tyco moves this Court to transfer venue to the Middle District of Pennsylvania. After reviewing the parties’ briefs and the applicable law, this Court DENIES Tyco’s motion. I. Background FCI USA, Inc.