Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Agere Systems Inc. v. Sony Corporation et al, No. 2:06-cv-00079 (E.D. Tex. May 15, 2008)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00079, Dkt. No. 178
Decided
May 15, 2008
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the above constructions. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties…
Length
41 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction In this case, Agere Systems, Inc. (“Agere”) contends that the defendants1 infringe various claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,452,958 to van Nee, 6,707,867 to Diepstraten, 5,448,585 to Belenky, 5,670,730 to Grewe, 5,599,739 to Merchant, 6,472,304 to Chittipeddi, and 6,340,827 to Choi.2 The patents-in-suit were originally assigned to AT&T Bell Laboratories, and have been assigned to Agere, AT&T’s successor, via intermediary Lucent Technologies.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error