Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Foodie Partners v. Jamba Juice Company, No. 2:06-cv-00012 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2007)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00012, Dkt. No. 101
Decided
October 30, 2007
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - for the foregoing reasons, the Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth above. For ease of reference, the Courts claim interpretations are set forth in a table attached to t…
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Court now issues this claim construction opinion construing the terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,950,448 (hereinafter “the ‘448 patent”). Plaintiff Foodie Partners (hereinafter “Foodie”) asserts that Def endant Jamba J uice Company has infring ed, ac tively induced other s to infring e, and contributorily infringed claims 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the ‘448 patent.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error