Sklar v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 2:06-cv-00007 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2007)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above entitled and numbered civil action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Memorandum Opinion and Order (Docket No. 89) c ontaining the Mag istrate Judge’ s claim construc tion ruling has been prese nted for consideration. Defe ndant has filed a motion for rec onsideration (D ocket No. 93) of the Memorandum Opinion and Order. Prior Art Microsoft argues the Magistrate Judge improperly considered U.S. Patent No. 5,790,121 (“the ‘121 patent”) in construing U.S. Patent Nos.