Polycom, Inc. et al v. Codian, Ltd et al, No. 2:05-cv-00520 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2007)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges, Polycom’s Motion to Compel Discovery Relating to Accused Codian Products (Docket Entry # 53) was referred to the Honorable Caroline M. Craven for the purposes of hearing and determining said motion. The Court, having reviewed the relevant briefing and hearing arguments of counsel, is of the opinion1 Plaintiff’s motion should be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I.