Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Metrologic Instruments, Inc., No. 2:05-cv-00509 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2006)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00509, Dkt. No. 37
Decided
August 8, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion to transfer venue
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Metrologic Instruments, Inc.’s Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion to Transfer Venue to the Southern District of New York (Docket No. 11). Having considered the parties’ written and oral arguments, the Court DENIES the motion. BACKGROUND Symbol Technologies, Inc. accuses its competitor, Metrologic Instruments, Inc., of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 5,479,002; 6,631,845; 5,646,390; 5,521,366; 5,591,952; and 6,854, 655. The patents relate to the field of laser scanners and dataform readers.