Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P., v. Ciba Vision Corporation, No. 2:05-cv-00491 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 26, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00491, Dkt. No. 426
Decided
September 26, 2008
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court rejects the inequitable conduct defense asserted by CIBA and holds that the '327 patent is enforceable
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction After a jury trial, the jury found CIBA liable for infringement of claims 1, 2, and 6 of United States Patent No. 5,712,327 (“the ‘327 patent”). The jury rejected CIBA’s invalidity defenses, and awarded reasonable royalty damages in the amount of $41,083,853. On March 27, 2008, the court held a be nch trial on the issue of inequitab le conduc t. This memorandum opinion and order constitutes the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52. The court has considered the admissible evidence and the parties’ briefing.