Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Vision Advancement LLC v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc, No. 2:05-cv-00455 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2007)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00455, Dkt. No. 175
Decided
February 26, 2007
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER that the Cour is of the opinion that the finding and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. The Court overrules dfts objections and adopts the memorandum opinion and order of the U S Magistrate Judge as the Opinion and Order…
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above entitled and numbered civil action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Memorandum Opinion and Order (Docket Nos. 140) conta ining the Ma gistrate Judge’ s claim construc tion ruling ha s been pr esented for consideration. Defendants have filed objections (Docket Nos. 151) to the Memorandum Opinion and Order; however the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case