Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Comcast Corporation et al, No. 2:05-cv-00443 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2007)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00443, Dkt. No. 144
Decided
February 8, 2007
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - granting motion to disqualify
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction. This case requires application of pr ofessional r esponsibility standards to a ttorneys who prosecute patent infringement cases for one client while concurrently representing, on other matters, a potential infringer. The court is persuaded that disqualification is required in the circumstances of this case. 2. Facts and Procedural Posture. Rembrandt Technologies, LP (“Rembrandt”) has filed three separate lawsuits in this court alleging inf ringement of the same pa tents by various c able companies.