Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Seven Networks Inc v. Visto Corporation, No. 2:05-cv-00365 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00365, Dkt. No. 99
Decided
December 29, 2006
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - addressing the technology at issue in this case and the merits of the claim construction issues. Court adopts the definitions addressed herein and parties may not refer to each other's claim construction posit…
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction Seven Networks, Inc. (“Seven”) asserts various claims of two United States patents in this case. The pa tents-in-suit are U.S. Patent No. 5,85 7,201 (“the ‘201 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,324,542 B1 (“the ‘542 patent”). The ‘542 patent is a continuation of the ‘201 patent. This opinion resolves the parties’ various cla im con struction di sputes. The c ourt will address br iefly the technology at issue in the case, then turn to the merits of the claim construction issues. 2.