Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Source, Inc. v. American Express Company, No. 2:05-cv-00364 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 14, 2007)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00364, Dkt. No. 132
Decided
September 14, 2007
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues. The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinon for the disputed terms of the 116 patent. The parties are ordered …
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After co nsidering the submissions and the arg uments of counse l, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction Plaintiff Source, Inc. accuses Defendant American Express Co. of infringing United States Patent No. Re. 36,116 (“the ‘116 patent”) entitled “Centralized Consumer Cash Value Accumulation System for Multiple Merchants.” The plaintiff alleges that the defendant infringes Claims 14, 15, 17, 19-23, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 33, and 34 of the ‘116 patent.