Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tinkers & Chance v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc., No. 2:05-cv-00349 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2006)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00349, Dkt. No. 20
Decided
February 23, 2006
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION & ORDER after reviewing the parties briefs and applicable case law, this Court Denies Leapfrogs 8 Motion to Transfer Venue
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Plaintiff Tinkers & Chance, an alleged Texas partnership, sued LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc., (hereinafter “LeapFrog”), a Delaware corporation, for allegedly infringing United States Patent No. 6,739,874 (hereinafter “the ’874 patent”). LeapFrog moves this Court to transfer venue to the Northern District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). After reviewing the parties’ briefs and applicable case law, this Court DENIES LeapFrog’s motion. II.