Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Micron Technology, Inc. vs Tessera, Inc., No. 2:05-cv-00319 (E.D. Tex. July 13, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00319, Dkt. No. 125
Decided
July 13, 2006
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - the Court interprets the claim language in this case as set forth herein. Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table attached to this opinion
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion constr ues terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,992,849 (“the ‘849 patent”), 5,107,328 (“the ‘328 patent ”), and Re. 36,325 (“the ‘325 patent”). Plaintiffs, Micron Technology, Inc. a nd Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. (collectively “Micron”), have asserted seve ral other patents against Defendant, Tessera, Inc. (“Tessera”), in this lawsuit, but only claim language from the ‘849, ‘325, and ‘328 patents remains in dispute. The Patents The patents in suit generally deal with microchip packaging.