Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

O2 Micro International Limited v. Rohm Co., Ltd., et al, No. 2:05-cv-00211 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2007)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00211, Dkt. No. 288
Decided
November 16, 2007
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - this opinion and order resolves the amterial claim construction disputes between the parties
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction In this case, O2 Micro asserts various claims of five United States patents against Rohm. 1 Three of the asserted patents are related, each sharing a common written description directed to power converters. These patents include U.S. Patent Nos. 6,259,615, 6,396,722, and 6,804,129. The two remaining patents are also related, each sharing a common written description directed to sequential burst mode circuits and systems. These patent include U.S. Patent Nos. 6,501,234 and 6,707,264.