Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Biax Corporation v. Intel Corporation, No. 2:05-cv-00184 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 1, 2007)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00184, Dkt. No. 252
Decided
March 1, 2007
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - the court adopts the following definitions for those terms in need of construction
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction Biax Corporation (“Biax”) asserts various claims of five United States patents in this case. Four of the pa tents are asserted against both defenda nts, Intel Corporation (“ Intel”) and Analog Devices, Inc. (“ADI”). These are U.S. Patent Nos. 4,847,755 (“the ‘755 patent”); 5,021,945 (“the ‘945 patent”); 5,517,628 (“the ‘628 patent”); and 6,253,313 (“the ‘313 patent”). A fifth patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,765,037 (“ the ‘037 pa tent”), is asserted only against defendant ADI.