Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

911EP, Inc v. Whelen Engineering Company, Inc et al, No. 2:05-cv-00137 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2007)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00137, Dkt. No. 192
Decided
March 23, 2007
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - the court issues the following order concerning the Claim Construction issues set forth herein
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counse l, the Court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction Plaintiff 911EP, I nc. (“ 911EP”) ac cuses De fendants W helen Engi neering Co., I nc. (“Whelen”), Federal Signal Corporation (“FSC”), Tomar Electronics, Inc. (“Tomar”), and Code 3, Inc.