Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. Buffalo Technology (USA) Inc et al, No. 2:05-cv-00053 (E.D. Tex. May 8, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00053, Dkt. No. 104
Decided
May 8, 2006
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION for the foregoing reasons, the Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth above. For ease of reference, the Courts claim interpretations are set forth in a table as Appendix B. The Claims…
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Appendi x A t o this M emo randum O pinion cont ains the releva nt claims of the ‘069 P atent with the disput ed1 term s indicat ed in bo ldface t ype. Append ix B co ntains the C ourt’s Claim Construct ion C hart , whi ch co nstrues the disputed term s. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION, Plaintiff, vs. BUFFALO TECHNOLOGY (USA), INC. and BUFFALO INC., Defendant. § § § § CASE NO.