Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fenner Investments, Ltd., v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al, No. 2:05-cv-00005 (E.D. Tex. May 16, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00005, Dkt. No. 389
Decided
May 16, 2006
Judge
John D. Love, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
32 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction Opinion cons trues terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,819,670 (“the ‘670 patent) and 5,561,706 (“the ‘706 pa tent”). Fenner Investments, Ltd. (“Fenner”) alleges Defendants UTStarcom, Inc ., Nortel Networks, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., and Alcatel USA, Inc., infringe both the ‘670 and ‘706 patent, but allege infringement of only the ‘706 patent against Juniper Networks, Inc., Nokia, Inc., Lucent Technologies, Inc., Ericsson, Inc., Ericsson AB, and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson.