Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Maurice Mitchell Innovations, L.P. v. Intel Corporation, No. 2:04-cv-00450 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2006)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00450, Dkt. No. 216
Decided
November 22, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - Having considered the parties written submissions and oral argument, the court grants 104 the motion. Accordingly, Mitchell has failed to raise a fact issue as to whether limitations nine, ten,thirteen, an…
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Intel Corporation’s (“Intel”) motion for summary judgment as to invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 112 (Docket No. 104 ). Having considered the parties’ written submissions and oral argument, the Court GRANTS the motion. BACKGROUND Maurice Mitchell Innovations, L.P. (“Mitchell”) filed suit against Intel on December 17, 2004 alleging infringement of Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 4,875,154 (“the ‘154 patent”).