Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Hyperion Solutions Corporation v. Outlooksoft Corporation, No. 2:04-cv-00436 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00436, Dkt. No. 67
Decided
March 22, 2006
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - the court issues this to resolve the parties Claim Construction disputes
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The cou rt issues th is m emorandum o pinion a nd or der t o r esolve the pa rties’ c laim construction disputes. I. Introduction Plaintiff Hyperion Solutions Corporation (“Hyperion”) has asserted United States Patent Nos. 4,989,141 (“the ‘141 pate nt”) a nd 5,189,608 (“the ‘608 pate nt”) (c ollectively, “the Hy perion patents”) against Defendant OutlookSoft Corporation (“OutlookSoft”). OutlookSoft, in turn, has asserted United States Patent Nos.