Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

OPTi Inc v. nVidia Corpation, No. 2:04-cv-00377 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00377, Dkt. No. 96
Decided
April 24, 2006
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and Order - the Court finds that the Pre-Snoop patents do disclose corresponding structure for the recited function and adopts OPTi's proposed construction
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Plaintiff OPTi Inc. (“OPTi”) has asserted that defendant nVidia Corporation (“nVidia”) infringes two families of OPTi patents: • OPTi’s “Compact ISA” or “CISA” patents – Namely, claims 1, 12, 13, 19, and 21 of United States Patent No. 6,098,141 (“the ‘141 patent”) and claim 5 of United States Patent No. 5,944,807 (“the ‘807 patent”); and • OPTi’s “Pre-Snoop” patents – Namely, claims 1, 7, 8, 9, 21, and 26 of United States Patent No. 5,710,906 (“the ‘906 patent”); claims 1, 3, 9, 17, 18, and 26 of United States Patent No.