Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

O2 Micro International Limited v. Monolithic Power Systems Inc, No. 2:04-cv-00359 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2006)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00359, Dkt. No. 203
Decided
March 28, 2006
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION & ORDER the court grants 16 Motion to transfer venue, the court tranfers this case to the Northern District of California. The court denies as moot 28,46,118,119,142 the motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdi…
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

For the reasons expressed in this order, the court grants Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.’s motion to transfer venue (#16). The court transfers venue of this case to the Northern District of California. The court denies as moot the motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp., Asustek Computer, Inc., and Michael Hsing (## 28, 46, 118, 119, and 142). 1. Factual Background and Procedural Posture. On October 24, 2001, O2 Micro International Limited (“O2 Micro”) sued Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.