Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Source Inc v. Rewards Network Inc, No. 2:04-cv-00347 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2005)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00347, Dkt. No. 22
Decided
September 27, 2005
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
n Ward on 9/27/05. (mpv, )MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. After considering all the listed factors, this Court DENIES Rewards' Motion to Transfer Venue. Rewards has not been able to rebut the strong presumption in favor of Source's choice of forum
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before this Court is Defendant Rewards Network, Inc.’s (hereinafter “Rewards”) Motion to Transfer Venue. Having considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court denies the motion. I. Background On October 1, 2004, Plaintiff Source, Inc., (Hereinafter “Source”) sued Rewards for allegedly infringing U.S. Patent No. 4,941,090 (the ‘090 patent), U.S. Patent No. 5,117,355 (the ‘355 patent), U.S. Patent No. 5,202,826 (the ‘826 pa tent), and U .S. Patent No. Re 36,116 (the ‘116 pa tent).