Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Autobytel Inc et al v Dealix Corp, No. 2:04-cv-00338 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 18, 2006)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00338, Dkt. No. 75
Decided
January 18, 2006
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION with Conlusion for the foregoing reasons, the Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in order. For ease of reference, the Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table as App…
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Claim Construction Opinion construes terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,282,517 (“the ‘517 patent”). Al so be fore the Cou rt is A utobytel, Inc.’s ( “Autobytel”) M otion to S trike the Ko rth Declaration (Docket No. 45). The Court will first discuss its claim construction and then address the motion to strike. BACKGROUND Autobytel alleges that Dealix Corporation (“Dealix”) infringes the ‘517 patent.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case