Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

02 Micro International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, No. 2:04-cv-00323 (E.D. Tex. June 28, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00323, Dkt. No. 84
Decided
June 28, 2006
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Court issues this memorandum opinion and order to resolve the parties' claim construction disputes - ruling set forth herein
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The c ourt iss ues th is m emorandum o pinion a nd or der t o r esolve the parties’ c laim construction disputes. 1. Introduction. In this case, the plaintiff, O2 Micro International Ltd. (“O2 Micro”), sued the defendants, Samsung Electronics Co., L td., and var ious affiliated c ompanies (collectively “Samsun g”), for infringement of United States Patent No s. 6,259,615 (“‘615 patent”), 6,396,722 (“‘722 patent”); 6,804,129 (“‘129 patent”); 6,707,264 (“‘264 patent”); and 6,501,234 (“‘234 patent”).