Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Sourcesprose Corporation v. The First American Corporation et al, No. 2:04-cv-00265 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00265, Dkt. No. 170
Decided
February 23, 2006
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION & ORDER after considering the parties submission, the arguments of counsel, and the pertinent portions of the record, the court is of the opinion that the claims of the patents should be contrued as set forth in this …
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The c ourt iss ues th is m emorandum o pinion a nd or der t o r esolve the parties’ c laim construction disputes. 1. Introduction. In this case, the plaintiff, SourceProse, Inc. (“SourceProse”) sued Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and various affiliated companies (collectively “Fidelity”), for infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,631,326 (“the ‘326 patent”), 6,678,615 (“the ‘615 patent”), and 6,842,698 (“the ‘698 patent”), all of which relate to systems and methods for performing flood zone determinations.