Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Paice LLP v. Toyota Motors Corp et al, No. 2:04-cv-00211 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 17, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00211, Dkt. No. 266
Decided
April 17, 2009
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Order
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Paice and Toyota’s Post-Hearing Proposed Findings of Fact a nd Conclusions of Law. Dkt. Nos. 261, 263 & 264. Also before the Court is the transcript and evidence from the remand hearing on prospective damages, which was held on July 21, 2008. See Dkt. Nos. 253-256 (minutes, exhibit list, witness list, and transcript).