Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Foundry Networks Inc v. Lucent Technologies Inc, No. 2:04-cv-00040 (E.D. Tex. May 24, 2005)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00040, Dkt. No. 73
Decided
May 24, 2005
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER regarding claim construction issues as set forth herein
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After co nsidering the submissions and the arg uments of counse l, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction The plaintiff, Foundr y Networ ks, I nc. (“ Foundry”), a lleges that the de fendant, L ucent Technologies, Inc. (“Lucent”), infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,118,864 (“the ‘864 patent”).