Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Qinetiq Limited v. Samsung Telecommunic, et al, No. 2:03-cv-00221 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 7, 2005)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:03-cv-00221, Dkt. No. 270
Decided
September 7, 2005
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Defendants' motion for relief from judgment is denied and the judgment is not satisfied
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Samsung Te lecommunications Amer ica, L .P., Samsung SDI Co., L td, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (hereinafter “Defendants”) move this Court for relief of judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(5) on the basis1 that the Defendants have satisfied the judgment against them in favor of QinetiQ Limited (hereinafter “QinetiQ”). QinetiQ obtained a judgment against the Defendants jointly and severally on January 14, 2005, in the amount of $17, 982,222 for the De fendants’ infringement of U .S.