Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Brooktrout Inc v. Eicon Networks Corp, et al, No. 2:03-cv-00059 (E.D. Tex. July 25, 2005)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:03-cv-00059, Dkt. No. 193
Decided
July 25, 2005
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denies in part Brooktrout's motion for a permanent injunction as set forth herein
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction. In this patent infringement case, the plaintiff has filed a motion for a permanent injunction based on the jury’s verdict. The requested injunction is too broad, as it would preclude the sale of a product with multiple non-infringing uses. The court therefore grants in part and denies in part Brooktrout’s motion for a permanent injunction for the reasons expressed in this order. 2. Factual Background and Procedural Posture. The plaintiff, Brooktrout Inc.