Sorkin v. Universal Building Products, No. 1:08-cv-00133 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 9, 2010)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS Plaintiff Felix L. Sorkin filed suit against Defendant Universal Building Products, Inc. (“UBP”), claiming that thirteen of UBP’s UNI-CHAIR construction chairs literally infringed one or more claims of United States Patent No. 7,237,367 (“the ‘367 patent”).
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error