Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Durr Systems, Inc. v. EFC Systems, Inc., No. 24-2158 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 20, 2026)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-2158
Decided
March 20, 2026
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Durr Systems, Inc. (“Durr”) sued EFC Systems, Inc. (“EFC”) alleging infringement of claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,189,804 (“’804 patent”), 6,360,962 (“’962 patent”), 7,017,835 (“’835 patent”), 8,141,797 (“’797 patent”), and 8,590,813 (“’813 patent”). The district court granted EFC’s motion to exclude the testimony of Durr’s expert , Vincent Dattilo, and its motion for summary judgment of noninfringement. Durr appeals.