Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Wakefield v. Blackboard Inc., No. 24-2030 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 23, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-2030
Also Docketed
No. 24-2031, No. 24-2032, No. 24-2033, No. 24-2035, No. 24-2036, No. 24-2037, No. 24-2038 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
April 23, 2025
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In 2022, this court affirmed the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding invalid all claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,162,696 (’696 pa- tent). See CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Blackboard, Inc. , No. 2021-2191, 2022 WL 2525330 (Fed. Cir. July 7, 2022) (per curiam). More than a year later, t he named inventor WAKEFIELD v. BLACKBOARD INC. 3 of the ’696 patent, Franz A. Wakefield, doing business as CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc.