Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Orange Electronic Co. Ltd. v. Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd., No. 24-1876 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 23, 2026)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1876
Also Docketed
No. 24-1885 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
January 23, 2026
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Orange Electronic Co. Ltd. (“Orange”) sued Autel In- telligent Technology Corp., Ltd. (“Autel”) in the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of claims 26 and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 8,031,064 (“’064 patent”). The jury found that both claims were not invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and not directed to patent ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and that Autel directly infringed the claims.