Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Vizio, Inc., No. 24-1783 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 17, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This patent infringement action was brought by Orti z & Associates Consulting, LLC (“Ortiz”) against Vizi o, Inc. After the district court granted Vizio’s motion to dismiss Ortiz’s first amended complaint, Vizio filed a motion for at- torney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285, which the distri ct court granted. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. I Ortiz is the assignee of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,147,299 (“the ’299 Patent”) and 9,549,285 (“the ’285 patent”), the two pa- tents asserted against Vizio in this case.