Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

GoTV Streaming, LLC v. Netflix, Inc., No. 24-1669 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2026)

Reversed Judgment for defendant directed — asserted claims ineligible under § 101
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
Nos. 24-1669, 24-1744
Also Docketed
No. 24-1744 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
February 9, 2026
Judge
Taranto, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
28 pages

Editorial Summary

AI-assisted editorial summary; not attorney-reviewed. Verify against the opinion itself before relying on any characterization of the holding.

GoTV asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 8,478,245, 8,989,715, and 8,103,865 against Netflix in the Central District of California; a jury found infringement of only the '715 patent and awarded $2.5 million. On appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's judgment that the '865 patent claims were invalid for indefiniteness, but held that the asserted claims of all three patents are invalid as ineligible under § 101 — entitling Netflix to judgment in its favor ending the case. The court also vacated the summary judgment of no induced infringement and the denial of GoTV's motion for a new trial on damages, noting substantial questions about the district court's damages-evidence rulings, though those issues were mooted by the ineligibility holding.